<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Round-up: Charging for online &#8211; Murdoch and the FT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/10/round-up-charging-for-online-murdoch-and-the-ft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/10/round-up-charging-for-online-murdoch-and-the-ft/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMH.com: News Corp in &#8217;second phase&#8217; of paid-for content plan &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/10/round-up-charging-for-online-murdoch-and-the-ft/comment-page-1/#comment-18317</link>
		<dc:creator>SMH.com: News Corp in &#8217;second phase&#8217; of paid-for content plan &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 11:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=12816#comment-18317</guid>
		<description>[...] digital chief executive, Richard Freudenstein, indicating that paid-for content plans, as announced by Murdoch in August, were now in a &#8217;second phase&#8217;. &#8220;The key points from Mr Freudenstein&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] digital chief executive, Richard Freudenstein, indicating that paid-for content plans, as announced by Murdoch in August, were now in a &#8217;second phase&#8217;. &#8220;The key points from Mr Freudenstein&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Smalera - Living Through 1500 &#8211; Wall Street Journal launching new paywall business website? - True/Slant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/10/round-up-charging-for-online-murdoch-and-the-ft/comment-page-1/#comment-16487</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Smalera - Living Through 1500 &#8211; Wall Street Journal launching new paywall business website? - True/Slant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=12816#comment-16487</guid>
		<description>[...] careers site, it was posted on 7/29. Could this new site have to do with Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s recent statements on charging for all news content by next year? Or the zany micropayment idea, still, as far as I know, set to debut this fall? Could it have to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] careers site, it was posted on 7/29. Could this new site have to do with Rupert Murdoch&#8217;s recent statements on charging for all news content by next year? Or the zany micropayment idea, still, as far as I know, set to debut this fall? Could it have to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Guardian deneys introducing a Paywall. &#171; Dairine88&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/10/round-up-charging-for-online-murdoch-and-the-ft/comment-page-1/#comment-16293</link>
		<dc:creator>The Guardian deneys introducing a Paywall. &#171; Dairine88&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=12816#comment-16293</guid>
		<description>[...] idea in that they restrict audiences for largely replicable content&#8221; She went on to say that, Murdoch, who released the original statement will &#8220;no doubt will find this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] idea in that they restrict audiences for largely replicable content&#8221; She went on to say that, Murdoch, who released the original statement will &#8220;no doubt will find this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journalism Daily: Numbers for journalists, mydigitalnewspaper and a Newsquest redesign &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/10/round-up-charging-for-online-murdoch-and-the-ft/comment-page-1/#comment-15888</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalism Daily: Numbers for journalists, mydigitalnewspaper and a Newsquest redesign &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=12816#comment-15888</guid>
		<description>[...] Round-up: Charging for online – Murdoch and the FT [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Round-up: Charging for online – Murdoch and the FT [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

