<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ofcom: Galloway&#8217;s Press TV programmes in breach of code</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/03/ofcom-galloways-press-tv-programmes-in-breach-of-code/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/03/ofcom-galloways-press-tv-programmes-in-breach-of-code/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: elizabeth morley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/03/ofcom-galloways-press-tv-programmes-in-breach-of-code/comment-page-1/#comment-101726</link>
		<dc:creator>elizabeth morley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 20:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=12702#comment-101726</guid>
		<description>You report that &quot;Press TV has been criticised by Ofcom for its impartial treatment of content.&quot; Impartial is good, isn&#039;t it? So why are they being criticised? Perhaps it&#039;s Ofcom that should be criticised for not knowing English.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You report that &#8220;Press TV has been criticised by Ofcom for its impartial treatment of content.&#8221; Impartial is good, isn&#8217;t it? So why are they being criticised? Perhaps it&#8217;s Ofcom that should be criticised for not knowing English.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

