<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PR Week: CIPR president on the NLA&#8217;s backlink charging plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/16/pr-week-cipr-president-on-the-nlas-backlink-charging-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/16/pr-week-cipr-president-on-the-nlas-backlink-charging-plans/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Anderson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/16/pr-week-cipr-president-on-the-nlas-backlink-charging-plans/comment-page-1/#comment-14794</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=12158#comment-14794</guid>
		<description>The NLA appears to be living in the dark ages. This is the organisaton that spends some of its income on reams of NLA stickers which is sends to agencies - do they think their audience is made up of 8 year olds? I&#039;m sure most of the NLA&#039;s &#039;clients&#039; (their amusing word for their relationship with the people who have to pay them) would prefer less stickers from the NLA and lower &#039;prices&#039; as well as a clear pricing structure... 

...on that note, an agency if you provide a cuttings service for a charity you work for pro-bono, the NLA still charges you full rate. They only charge the charity a reduced rate - good to see them do their (tiny) bit for charity. 

On the point about charging for links, it&#039;s just laughable. Someone over at the NLA should read Chris Anderson&#039;s latest book Free and then attempt to justify what they are doing. It really seems like they have bitten off more than they can chew this time - and perhaps its time for this dinosaur of an organisation to become extinct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The NLA appears to be living in the dark ages. This is the organisaton that spends some of its income on reams of NLA stickers which is sends to agencies &#8211; do they think their audience is made up of 8 year olds? I&#8217;m sure most of the NLA&#8217;s &#8216;clients&#8217; (their amusing word for their relationship with the people who have to pay them) would prefer less stickers from the NLA and lower &#8216;prices&#8217; as well as a clear pricing structure&#8230; </p>
<p>&#8230;on that note, an agency if you provide a cuttings service for a charity you work for pro-bono, the NLA still charges you full rate. They only charge the charity a reduced rate &#8211; good to see them do their (tiny) bit for charity. </p>
<p>On the point about charging for links, it&#8217;s just laughable. Someone over at the NLA should read Chris Anderson&#8217;s latest book Free and then attempt to justify what they are doing. It really seems like they have bitten off more than they can chew this time &#8211; and perhaps its time for this dinosaur of an organisation to become extinct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

