<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newspapers: Turn off your RSS feeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Non aprite quel feed [repêchage] &#171; mformento &#124; blinkenmedia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-23168</link>
		<dc:creator>Non aprite quel feed [repêchage] &#171; mformento &#124; blinkenmedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 17:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-23168</guid>
		<description>[...] dovrebbero smettere di offrire molti dei feed RSS che producono ai lettori, almeno secondoMalcolm Coles, in questo post. Meglio Twitter, perché almeno si genera più conversation attorno alle testate, senza contare [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dovrebbero smettere di offrire molti dei feed RSS che producono ai lettori, almeno secondoMalcolm Coles, in questo post. Meglio Twitter, perché almeno si genera più conversation attorno alle testate, senza contare [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Non aprire quel feed &#171; blinkenmedia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-22112</link>
		<dc:creator>Non aprire quel feed &#171; blinkenmedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-22112</guid>
		<description>[...] dovrebbero smettere di offrire molti dei feed RSS che producono ai lettori, almeno secondo Malcolm Coles, in questo post. Meglio Twitter, perché almeno si genera più conversation attorno alle testate, senza contare che [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dovrebbero smettere di offrire molti dei feed RSS che producono ai lettori, almeno secondo Malcolm Coles, in questo post. Meglio Twitter, perché almeno si genera più conversation attorno alle testate, senza contare che [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liberty News</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-14921</link>
		<dc:creator>Liberty News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-14921</guid>
		<description>The reason people don&#039;t use RSS feeds as much is because they are not full-text-feeds.  I say turn them to full text or just use them as a sort of internal messaging system.
 
I use Full-Text-Feeds with the http://www.Feedjournal.com  application on my website http://www.Libertynewsprint.com
Its much easier to follow the feeds seeing them in an elegant full text newspaper format.

Cheers,

~J</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason people don&#8217;t use RSS feeds as much is because they are not full-text-feeds.  I say turn them to full text or just use them as a sort of internal messaging system.</p>
<p>I use Full-Text-Feeds with the <a href="http://www.Feedjournal.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Feedjournal.com</a>  application on my website <a href="http://www.Libertynewsprint.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Libertynewsprint.com</a><br />
Its much easier to follow the feeds seeing them in an elegant full text newspaper format.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>~J</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why RSS Versus Twitter Beats Federer Versus Roddick In Straight Sets &#171; Jon Bernstein</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-14462</link>
		<dc:creator>Why RSS Versus Twitter Beats Federer Versus Roddick In Straight Sets &#171; Jon Bernstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-14462</guid>
		<description>[...] following day, the post was republished on Journalism.co.uk and was subsequently retweeted 35 times, with 18 on-site comments. Oh, and it also appeared on the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] following day, the post was republished on Journalism.co.uk and was subsequently retweeted 35 times, with 18 on-site comments. Oh, and it also appeared on the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The news flow: Dealing with the fire hose &#124; Monday Note</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-14431</link>
		<dc:creator>The news flow: Dealing with the fire hose &#124; Monday Note</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 08:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-14431</guid>
		<description>[...] to suggest newspapers ought to close their RSS feeds (so 2006&#8230;) and switch to Twitter. This story on the British blog Journalism, by columnist blogger Malcom Coles, outlines four reasons: - readers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to suggest newspapers ought to close their RSS feeds (so 2006&#8230;) and switch to Twitter. This story on the British blog Journalism, by columnist blogger Malcom Coles, outlines four reasons: &#8211; readers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-07-04 at Alan Vonlanthen&#8217;s blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-14427</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-07-04 at Alan Vonlanthen&#8217;s blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 23:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-14427</guid>
		<description>[...] Newspapers: Turn off your RSS feeds &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&#039; Blog The latest subscriber figures (see table below) show that, apart from a couple of exceptions, it’s time for newspapers to turn off their RSS feeds – and hand over the server space, technical support and webpage real estate to their Twitter accounts. Via ChouingMedia (tags: rss twitter newspapers media trends) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Newspapers: Turn off your RSS feeds | Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog The latest subscriber figures (see table below) show that, apart from a couple of exceptions, it’s time for newspapers to turn off their RSS feeds – and hand over the server space, technical support and webpage real estate to their Twitter accounts. Via ChouingMedia (tags: rss twitter newspapers media trends) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Coles: re-thinking newspapers and RSS feeds &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-14403</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles: re-thinking newspapers and RSS feeds &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 14:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-14403</guid>
		<description>[...] I was wrong,&#8221; writes Malcolm Coles. After a little reflection on comments received about  his post &#8216; Newspapers: Turn off your RSS feeds&#8216; [also pasted on the Online Journalism Blog and his own blog] he concludes that link-bait [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I was wrong,&#8221; writes Malcolm Coles. After a little reflection on comments received about  his post &#8216; Newspapers: Turn off your RSS feeds&#8216; [also pasted on the Online Journalism Blog and his own blog] he concludes that link-bait [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Newspapers: turn off your RSS feeds &#124; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-14402</link>
		<dc:creator>Newspapers: turn off your RSS feeds &#124; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:23:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-14402</guid>
		<description>[...] can read some of the defences of RSS here and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can read some of the defences of RSS here and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Coles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-14401</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-14401</guid>
		<description>You can read my massive u-turn on this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/newspapers-leave-rss-on/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;over here&lt;/a&gt; ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can read my massive u-turn on this <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/newspapers-leave-rss-on/" rel="nofollow">over here</a> &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I&#8217;m sorry I suggested newspapers turn off their RSS feeds &#8230; &#187; malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-14400</link>
		<dc:creator>I&#8217;m sorry I suggested newspapers turn off their RSS feeds &#8230; &#187; malcolm coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 12:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-14400</guid>
		<description>[...] OK, newspapers shouldn&#039;t turn off RSS feeds like I said here. And here. And here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OK, newspapers shouldn&#39;t turn off RSS feeds like I said here. And here. And here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Twitter Going to Replace RSS for News Sites? &#124; (iverson's) currentbuzz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-14304</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Twitter Going to Replace RSS for News Sites? &#124; (iverson's) currentbuzz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 16:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-14304</guid>
		<description>[...]  Newspapers: Turn off your RSS feeds  (blogs.journalism.co.uk) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Newspapers: Turn off your RSS feeds  (blogs.journalism.co.uk) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-07-01 &#124; sammeddis.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-14293</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-07-01 &#124; sammeddis.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-14293</guid>
		<description>[...] Newspapers urged to &#039;turn off your RSS feeds&#039; &#039;The latest subscriber figures (see table below) show that, apart from a couple of exceptions, it’s time for newspapers to turn off their RSS feeds – and hand over the server space, technical support and webpage real estate to their Twitter accounts.&#039; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Newspapers urged to &#39;turn off your RSS feeds&#39; &#39;The latest subscriber figures (see table below) show that, apart from a couple of exceptions, it’s time for newspapers to turn off their RSS feeds – and hand over the server space, technical support and webpage real estate to their Twitter accounts.&#39; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Coles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-14283</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-14283</guid>
		<description>Mark: I think I&#039;m definitely in a minority of one. You can read &lt;a href=&quot;http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;some more people disagreeing&lt;/a&gt; on OJB. Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: I think I&#8217;m definitely in a minority of one. You can read <a href="http://onlinejournalismblog.com/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/" rel="nofollow">some more people disagreeing</a> on OJB. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-14282</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 11:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-14282</guid>
		<description>Malcolm:  I&#039;m not really going to go into a tit-for-tat exchange here. If you&#039;d like to email me I would be happy to discuss automating posts on my personal blog from twitter and how it&#039;s working.

Now back to this thread. My comments here were motivated by a personal opinion that standards of accuracy also apply to those who report or comment on journalism and the publishing industry. But to each their own right?

This has been a good conversation. Have a good day, looking forward to reading your posts more in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Malcolm:  I&#8217;m not really going to go into a tit-for-tat exchange here. If you&#8217;d like to email me I would be happy to discuss automating posts on my personal blog from twitter and how it&#8217;s working.</p>
<p>Now back to this thread. My comments here were motivated by a personal opinion that standards of accuracy also apply to those who report or comment on journalism and the publishing industry. But to each their own right?</p>
<p>This has been a good conversation. Have a good day, looking forward to reading your posts more in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Coles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/01/newspapers-turn-off-your-rss-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-14279</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 10:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11554#comment-14279</guid>
		<description>Mark: Well, it was a blog post. I&#039;m allowed to be polemical!

Obviously, I couldn&#039;t resist going to look at your RSS feed. Don&#039;t take this the wrong way, please - I&#039;m not doing this to be overly defensive or arsey. But it&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://markforscher.com/feed/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. And it suffers from truncated headings. And &lt;a href=&quot;http://markforscher.com/2009/06/wild-goose-chase/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this one&lt;/a&gt; doesn&#039;t seem to be anything?

Keeping RSS feeds going is not resource free.

You can get your own back now by going to look at mine ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: Well, it was a blog post. I&#8217;m allowed to be polemical!</p>
<p>Obviously, I couldn&#8217;t resist going to look at your RSS feed. Don&#8217;t take this the wrong way, please &#8211; I&#8217;m not doing this to be overly defensive or arsey. But it&#8217;s <a href="http://markforscher.com/feed/" rel="nofollow">here</a>. And it suffers from truncated headings. And <a href="http://markforscher.com/2009/06/wild-goose-chase/" rel="nofollow">this one</a> doesn&#8217;t seem to be anything?</p>
<p>Keeping RSS feeds going is not resource free.</p>
<p>You can get your own back now by going to look at mine &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

