<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Going back to the backlink licensing case: NLA&#8217;s full statement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/26/going-back-to-the-backlink-licencing-case-nlas-full-statement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/26/going-back-to-the-backlink-licencing-case-nlas-full-statement/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PRCA launch petition against NLA&#8217;s backlink charging plans &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/26/going-back-to-the-backlink-licencing-case-nlas-full-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-15884</link>
		<dc:creator>PRCA launch petition against NLA&#8217;s backlink charging plans &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 16:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11548#comment-15884</guid>
		<description>[...] The Public Relations Consultants Association (PRCA) has launched a petition on Twitter calling on the Newspaper Licensing Agency to abandon recent proposals to charge organisations that forward and rece.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The Public Relations Consultants Association (PRCA) has launched a petition on Twitter calling on the Newspaper Licensing Agency to abandon recent proposals to charge organisations that forward and rece&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Out-Law.com: ECJ rules that 11-word clippings can infringe copyright &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/26/going-back-to-the-backlink-licencing-case-nlas-full-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-15269</link>
		<dc:creator>Out-Law.com: ECJ rules that 11-word clippings can infringe copyright &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 10:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11548#comment-15269</guid>
		<description>[...] links: the UK&#8217;s Newspaper Licensing Agency&#8217;s hyperlink protection plans and subsequent aggregator [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] links: the UK&#8217;s Newspaper Licensing Agency&#8217;s hyperlink protection plans and subsequent aggregator [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PR Week: CIPR president on the NLA&#8217;s backlink charging plans &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/26/going-back-to-the-backlink-licencing-case-nlas-full-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-14793</link>
		<dc:creator>PR Week: CIPR president on the NLA&#8217;s backlink charging plans &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11548#comment-14793</guid>
		<description>[...] latest response to the Newspaper Licensing Agency&#8217;s (NLA) proposals to regulate hyperlinks to newspaper content for c... &#8211; this time from president of the Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR), Kevin [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] latest response to the Newspaper Licensing Agency&#8217;s (NLA) proposals to regulate hyperlinks to newspaper content for c&#8230; &#8211; this time from president of the Chartered Institute of Public Relations (CIPR), Kevin [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Media Mouse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/26/going-back-to-the-backlink-licencing-case-nlas-full-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-14495</link>
		<dc:creator>Media Mouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11548#comment-14495</guid>
		<description>An interesting debate between the NLA and the PRCA here - http://prbristol.co.uk/blog/2009/07/06/the-newspaper-licensing-agency-charging-for-weblinks/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting debate between the NLA and the PRCA here &#8211; <a href="http://prbristol.co.uk/blog/2009/07/06/the-newspaper-licensing-agency-charging-for-weblinks/" rel="nofollow">http://prbristol.co.uk/blog/2009/07/06/the-newspaper-licensing-agency-charging-for-weblinks/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/26/going-back-to-the-backlink-licencing-case-nlas-full-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-14225</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 08:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11548#comment-14225</guid>
		<description>And you&#039;ll note they didn&#039;t answer the legal question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And you&#8217;ll note they didn&#8217;t answer the legal question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paidContent:UK: News aggregator may take legal action against NLA copying levy &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/26/going-back-to-the-backlink-licencing-case-nlas-full-statement/comment-page-1/#comment-14183</link>
		<dc:creator>paidContent:UK: News aggregator may take legal action against NLA copying levy &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 09:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11548#comment-14183</guid>
		<description>[...] see: &#8216;Going back to the backlink licensing case: NLA’s full statement&#8217; [Journalism.co.uk Editors&#039; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] see: &#8216;Going back to the backlink licensing case: NLA’s full statement&#8217; [Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

