<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Andy Piper: Chasing the Daily Mail for Flickr attribution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/25/andy-piper-chasing-the-daily-mail-for-flickr-attribution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/25/andy-piper-chasing-the-daily-mail-for-flickr-attribution/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Commenters accuse Mail of image misuse &#8211; a bigger missed opportunity for publishers? &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/25/andy-piper-chasing-the-daily-mail-for-flickr-attribution/comment-page-1/#comment-22618</link>
		<dc:creator>Commenters accuse Mail of image misuse &#8211; a bigger missed opportunity for publishers? &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11443#comment-22618</guid>
		<description>[...] This is not the first time the Mail&#8217;s use of online images has been challenged, but issues of copyright aside, Kevin Anderson suggests that there is a bigger opportunity being missed by newspapers at large (scroll down to the comments): &#8220;[T]his is another example of the news industry missing an opportunity to build community around what they do. When I use Creative Commons photos from sites like Flickr, firstly, I honour the terms of the licence. Secondly, I drop the Flickr user a note letting them know that I&#8217;ve used a photo on our site. It&#8217;s not only a way to use nice photos, but it&#8217;s also a way to build goodwill to what we&#8217;re doing and do a little soft touch promotion of our coverage. It takes a minutes out of my day to create that email, but instead of a backlash, I often get a thank you. They let their friends know that the Guardian has used their picture. It&#8217;s brilliant for everyone. Their are benefits to being good neighbours online, rather than viewing the internet as a vast repository of free content.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is not the first time the Mail&#8217;s use of online images has been challenged, but issues of copyright aside, Kevin Anderson suggests that there is a bigger opportunity being missed by newspapers at large (scroll down to the comments): &#8220;[T]his is another example of the news industry missing an opportunity to build community around what they do. When I use Creative Commons photos from sites like Flickr, firstly, I honour the terms of the licence. Secondly, I drop the Flickr user a note letting them know that I&#8217;ve used a photo on our site. It&#8217;s not only a way to use nice photos, but it&#8217;s also a way to build goodwill to what we&#8217;re doing and do a little soft touch promotion of our coverage. It takes a minutes out of my day to create that email, but instead of a backlash, I often get a thank you. They let their friends know that the Guardian has used their picture. It&#8217;s brilliant for everyone. Their are benefits to being good neighbours online, rather than viewing the internet as a vast repository of free content.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/25/andy-piper-chasing-the-daily-mail-for-flickr-attribution/comment-page-1/#comment-22614</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 10:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11443#comment-22614</guid>
		<description>More stealing this morning from the Daily Mail.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1234050/Creasing-Banking-funny-photo-moneyfacing-craze-sweeping-web.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More stealing this morning from the Daily Mail.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1234050/Creasing-Banking-funny-photo-moneyfacing-craze-sweeping-web.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1234050/Creasing-Banking-funny-photo-moneyfacing-craze-sweeping-web.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith Townend</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/25/andy-piper-chasing-the-daily-mail-for-flickr-attribution/comment-page-1/#comment-14056</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11443#comment-14056</guid>
		<description>Or had fun with Photoshop, if Anton Vowl&#039;s suspicion is correct: http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/06/09/the-amazing-transparent-headrest/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or had fun with Photoshop, if Anton Vowl&#8217;s suspicion is correct: <a href="http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/06/09/the-amazing-transparent-headrest/" rel="nofollow">http://www.mailwatch.co.uk/2009/06/09/the-amazing-transparent-headrest/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Ferguson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/25/andy-piper-chasing-the-daily-mail-for-flickr-attribution/comment-page-1/#comment-14054</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Ferguson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11443#comment-14054</guid>
		<description>It could be worse, they could have rotated it 180 degrees and claimed it&#039;s a different photo:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1195215/Stunning-pictures-hole-clouds-astronauts-witness-volcano-eruption-International-Space-Station.html
(ok, at least those photos have an intact NASA copyright)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be worse, they could have rotated it 180 degrees and claimed it&#8217;s a different photo:<br />
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1195215/Stunning-pictures-hole-clouds-astronauts-witness-volcano-eruption-International-Space-Station.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1195215/Stunning-pictures-hole-clouds-astronauts-witness-volcano-eruption-International-Space-Station.html</a><br />
(ok, at least those photos have an intact NASA copyright)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Belam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/25/andy-piper-chasing-the-daily-mail-for-flickr-attribution/comment-page-1/#comment-14042</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Belam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 10:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11443#comment-14042</guid>
		<description>My favourite will always be &quot;1: Type &#039;fat dog&#039; into Flickr. 2: Output the search results as an &#039;article&#039;. 3: Profit!&quot;

http://www.currybet.net/cbet_blog/2008/05/daily_mail_fat_dog.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favourite will always be &#8220;1: Type &#8216;fat dog&#8217; into Flickr. 2: Output the search results as an &#8216;article&#8217;. 3: Profit!&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.currybet.net/cbet_blog/2008/05/daily_mail_fat_dog.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.currybet.net/cbet_blog/2008/05/daily_mail_fat_dog.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

