<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Right of a blogger&#8217;s anonymity: a selection of views</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online anonymity: Journalism.co.uk joins the debate on Al Jazeera English &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-17702</link>
		<dc:creator>Online anonymity: Journalism.co.uk joins the debate on Al Jazeera English &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 15:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-17702</guid>
		<description>[...] from the Committee to Protect Bloggers. It looked at the recent Liskula Cohen case in New York, Times v NightJack in the UK, and raised multiple questions about the practicalities &#8211; and future &#8211; of blogging [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] from the Committee to Protect Bloggers. It looked at the recent Liskula Cohen case in New York, Times v NightJack in the UK, and raised multiple questions about the practicalities &#8211; and future &#8211; of blogging [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous local hack: They have &#8216;fundamentally destroyed the layout of my papers&#8217; &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-14187</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous local hack: They have &#8216;fundamentally destroyed the layout of my papers&#8217; &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 10:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-14187</guid>
		<description>[...] Three warnings attached to this Ed Pick: 1. We don&#8217;t who he is, who he works for, or if it&#8217;s really true. 2. It contains very strong language. 3. This blogger might not be in a newspaper job for a long if he gets the NightJack treatment. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Three warnings attached to this Ed Pick: 1. We don&#8217;t who he is, who he works for, or if it&#8217;s really true. 2. It contains very strong language. 3. This blogger might not be in a newspaper job for a long if he gets the NightJack treatment. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Readers Edition &#187; Großbritannien: Gericht entscheidet gegen die Anonymitätsrechte eines Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-13992</link>
		<dc:creator>Readers Edition &#187; Großbritannien: Gericht entscheidet gegen die Anonymitätsrechte eines Bloggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 02:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-13992</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Schlussfolgerungs- und Detektivarbeit&#8221; nannte. Ich habe bereits einige Links auf dem Redakteursblog von Journalism.co.uk und meinem eigenen Blog zusammengestellt, &#252;ber die die ganze Geschichte nachzuvollziehen ist. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;Schlussfolgerungs- und Detektivarbeit&#8221; nannte. Ich habe bereits einige Links auf dem Redakteursblog von Journalism.co.uk und meinem eigenen Blog zusammengestellt, &#252;ber die die ganze Geschichte nachzuvollziehen ist. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices auf Deutsch &#187; Großbritannien: Gericht entscheidet gegen die Anonymitätsrechte eines Bloggers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-13979</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices auf Deutsch &#187; Großbritannien: Gericht entscheidet gegen die Anonymitätsrechte eines Bloggers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 17:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-13979</guid>
		<description>[...] Eady die „Schlussfolgerungs- und Detektivarbeit“ nannte. Ich habe bereits einige Links auf dem Redakteursblog von Journalism.co.uk und meinem eigenen Blog zusammengestellt, über die die ganze Geschichte nachzuvollziehen ist. Hier [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eady die „Schlussfolgerungs- und Detektivarbeit“ nannte. Ich habe bereits einige Links auf dem Redakteursblog von Journalism.co.uk und meinem eigenen Blog zusammengestellt, über die die ganze Geschichte nachzuvollziehen ist. Hier [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online: The unmasking of NightJack as told by the UK blogs &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-13975</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online: The unmasking of NightJack as told by the UK blogs &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-13975</guid>
		<description>[...] first post for the site looks at the implications of the NightJack case (which I&#8217;ve previously rounded up here) with links to some of the best UK blog posts on the subject. &#8220;A victory for freedom of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first post for the site looks at the implications of the NightJack case (which I&#8217;ve previously rounded up here) with links to some of the best UK blog posts on the subject. &#8220;A victory for freedom of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Global Voices Online &#187; United Kingdom: Court decides against a blogger&#8217;s rights to anonymity</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-13973</link>
		<dc:creator>Global Voices Online &#187; United Kingdom: Court decides against a blogger&#8217;s rights to anonymity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 11:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-13973</guid>
		<description>[...] and detective&#039; process. I&#039;ve previously rounded up a good mix of links on the Journalism.co.uk Editors&#039; Blog and my own blog which tell the story, but here are a selection of the best blog posts, which draw [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and detective&#39; process. I&#39;ve previously rounded up a good mix of links on the Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog and my own blog which tell the story, but here are a selection of the best blog posts, which draw [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That was the week that was &#171; The Martin Cloake blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-13890</link>
		<dc:creator>That was the week that was &#171; The Martin Cloake blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-13890</guid>
		<description>[...] have been much in the news this week, with much debate over the unmasking of police blogger Nightjack by The Times. Paul Bradshaw&#8217;s Online Journalism Blog, always a good point of reference, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have been much in the news this week, with much debate over the unmasking of police blogger Nightjack by The Times. Paul Bradshaw&#8217;s Online Journalism Blog, always a good point of reference, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymiteten är i fara &#124; KATTKORGEN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-13876</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymiteten är i fara &#124; KATTKORGEN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 00:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-13876</guid>
		<description>[...] Fler synpunkter kan du läsa på journalism.co.uk. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fler synpunkter kan du läsa på journalism.co.uk. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is the Times hiding negative comments about its Nightjack story? &#187; malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-13864</link>
		<dc:creator>Is the Times hiding negative comments about its Nightjack story? &#187; malcolm coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 19:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-13864</guid>
		<description>[...] and comments have been fairly negative about the Times&#039;s decision to unmask Nightjack, the no-longer-anonymous police blogger - none more [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and comments have been fairly negative about the Times&#39;s decision to unmask Nightjack, the no-longer-anonymous police blogger &#8211; none more [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: One Man and His Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-13858</link>
		<dc:creator>One Man and His Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 12:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-13858</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Times vrs NightJack: Destroying Journalists&#039; Reputation...&lt;/strong&gt;

And so, e-mails and tweets arrive asking what I think of the exposure of anonymous police blogger NightJack by The Times. I think you should probably read the couple of compilations of links that Judith has done on journalism.co.uk and......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Times vrs NightJack: Destroying Journalists&#8217; Reputation&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>And so, e-mails and tweets arrive asking what I think of the exposure of anonymous police blogger NightJack by The Times. I think you should probably read the couple of compilations of links that Judith has done on journalism.co.uk and&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The complicated case of the (now not) anonymous police blogger, The Times, and &#8216;public interest&#8217; &#124; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-13854</link>
		<dc:creator>The complicated case of the (now not) anonymous police blogger, The Times, and &#8216;public interest&#8217; &#124; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-13854</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE 7: Fellow public service blogger and ambulance driver Tom Reynolds gives his views on the case. Chicken Yoghurt gives his on the media&#8217;s use of anonymous sources. David MacLean responds: &#8220;Of course journalists rely on anonymous sources, but if a rival national newspaper found out who was tipping off a competitor, they’d more than likely expose them if the resulting story would be of interest to the public.&#8221;. Emily Bell highlights the raft of furious comments on The Times&#8217; Crime Central blog. Gary Andrews gives his take. And Journalism.co.uk round up some more besides. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE 7: Fellow public service blogger and ambulance driver Tom Reynolds gives his views on the case. Chicken Yoghurt gives his on the media&#8217;s use of anonymous sources. David MacLean responds: &#8220;Of course journalists rely on anonymous sources, but if a rival national newspaper found out who was tipping off a competitor, they’d more than likely expose them if the resulting story would be of interest to the public.&#8221;. Emily Bell highlights the raft of furious comments on The Times&#8217; Crime Central blog. Gary Andrews gives his take. And Journalism.co.uk round up some more besides. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bloggere fradømt retten til anonymitet &#171; NONA: nettverket for oss som jobber med nettmedier</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-13853</link>
		<dc:creator>Bloggere fradømt retten til anonymitet &#171; NONA: nettverket for oss som jobber med nettmedier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 09:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-13853</guid>
		<description>[...] Journalism.co.uk har mange gode lenker om den, og Judith har fulgt opp med et par ekstra lenker på sin private blogg. I NightJacks tilfelle er bloggen nå ettersom jeg forstår blitt fjernet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Journalism.co.uk har mange gode lenker om den, og Judith har fulgt opp med et par ekstra lenker på sin private blogg. I NightJacks tilfelle er bloggen nå ettersom jeg forstår blitt fjernet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Online Journalism Blog: How to blog anonymously &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-13848</link>
		<dc:creator>Online Journalism Blog: How to blog anonymously &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-13848</guid>
		<description>[...] of the issues raised by a British court&#8217;s decision to reveal the identity of anonymous police blogger NightJack, Paul Bradshaw offers seven tips on keeping [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the issues raised by a British court&#8217;s decision to reveal the identity of anonymous police blogger NightJack, Paul Bradshaw offers seven tips on keeping [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: From the Online &#187; NightJack - issues raised</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/comment-page-1/#comment-13842</link>
		<dc:creator>From the Online &#187; NightJack - issues raised</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 18:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/right-of-a-bloggers-anonymity-a-selection-of-views/#comment-13842</guid>
		<description>[...] already did a round-up post for the Journalism.co.uk Editors&#8217; Blog but these some are some good points I&#8217;ve seen made since [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] already did a round-up post for the Journalism.co.uk Editors&#8217; Blog but these some are some good points I&#8217;ve seen made since [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

