<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FT.com: Murdoch considers charging for online news, developing e-reader</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/07/ftcom-murdoch-considers-charging-for-online-news-developing-e-reader/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/07/ftcom-murdoch-considers-charging-for-online-news-developing-e-reader/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Staffroom Secrets &#124; Blog &#124; Rupert Murdoch’s newspaper ad apology</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/07/ftcom-murdoch-considers-charging-for-online-news-developing-e-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-124639</link>
		<dc:creator>Staffroom Secrets &#124; Blog &#124; Rupert Murdoch’s newspaper ad apology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=10070#comment-124639</guid>
		<description>[...] FT.com: Murdoch considers charging for online news, developing e-reader [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FT.com: Murdoch considers charging for online news, developing e-reader [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent.co.uk: New York Times considering charging for content? &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/07/ftcom-murdoch-considers-charging-for-online-news-developing-e-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-12987</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent.co.uk: New York Times considering charging for content? &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 09:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=10070#comment-12987</guid>
		<description>[...] A new charging system for the WSJ was announced this week and tweets from the New York Times suggested a similar move could be made. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A new charging system for the WSJ was announced this week and tweets from the New York Times suggested a similar move could be made. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links for the weekend &#124; Links para o fim de semana &#171; O Lago &#124; The Lake</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/07/ftcom-murdoch-considers-charging-for-online-news-developing-e-reader/comment-page-1/#comment-12859</link>
		<dc:creator>Links for the weekend &#124; Links para o fim de semana &#171; O Lago &#124; The Lake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 09:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=10070#comment-12859</guid>
		<description>[...] 2&#8217;s philosophy is one increasingly rejected by mainstream media management. Rupert Murdoch today announced that NewsCorp content could be moved behind paid walls in order to fix a ­&#8217;malfunctioning&#8217; business model; while chief executive of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 2&#8217;s philosophy is one increasingly rejected by mainstream media management. Rupert Murdoch today announced that NewsCorp content could be moved behind paid walls in order to fix a ­&#8217;malfunctioning&#8217; business model; while chief executive of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

