Jacob Zuma is continuing his civil case against the Guardian newspaper, despite an apology run by the paper this week for an article about the South African presidential candidate.
The article by Simon Jenkins, which has been removed from the Guardian website, suggested he was guilty of rape.
The reference was the result of an editing error, the paper maintains – Zuma was acquitted of rape charges in 2006, it said in its apology.
After publication Zuma demanded an apology and legal proceedings against the paper for libel have commenced in the High Court, a release from Zuma’s legal firm Schillings said on Monday.
The paper’s statement on April 21 was ‘unacceptable to Mr Zuma’, a spokeswoman on behalf of Zuma told Journalism.co.uk.
“Mr Zuma’s civil claim for damages and an appropriate apology against The Guardian continues,” she said.
“Both legal teams for Mr Zuma and The Guardian are continuing their negotiations about the damages amount that will be payable and how an acceptable apology will be made.
“Should there not be an acceptable out of court resolution, the matter is likely to go to trial.”
A spokeswoman for the Guardian made no further comment beyond Tuesday’s published apology.