<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NYTimes.com: Seattle Post-Intelligencer goes web only</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/17/nytimescom-seattle-post-intelligencer-goes-web-only/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/17/nytimescom-seattle-post-intelligencer-goes-web-only/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LA Times: The online-only Seattle-Post Intelligencer one year on &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/17/nytimescom-seattle-post-intelligencer-goes-web-only/comment-page-1/#comment-29685</link>
		<dc:creator>LA Times: The online-only Seattle-Post Intelligencer one year on &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 09:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=8986#comment-29685</guid>
		<description>[...] LA Times takes a look at the Seattle-Post Intelligencer a year after the 146-old US newspaper went only online-only and was reborn as SeattlePI.com: [I]n the year since the Post-Intelligencer printed its last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LA Times takes a look at the Seattle-Post Intelligencer a year after the 146-old US newspaper went only online-only and was reborn as SeattlePI.com: [I]n the year since the Post-Intelligencer printed its last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

