<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IndexOnCensorship.org: European Court judgement on Times is &#8216;disappointing and weak&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/11/indexoncensorshiporg-european-court-judgement-on-times-is-disappointing-and-weak/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/11/indexoncensorshiporg-european-court-judgement-on-times-is-disappointing-and-weak/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Article 10 and the Duke of Brunswick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/11/indexoncensorshiporg-european-court-judgement-on-times-is-disappointing-and-weak/comment-page-1/#comment-11086</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Article 10 and the Duke of Brunswick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=8837#comment-11086</guid>
		<description>[...] ruling a setback for web publishing (&#8221;a disappointing and weak judgment&#8221;) (also here) free speech law @ blogspot: Times v. UK: another cop out (&#8221;another very weak Strasbourg [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ruling a setback for web publishing (&#8221;a disappointing and weak judgment&#8221;) (also here) free speech law @ blogspot: Times v. UK: another cop out (&#8221;another very weak Strasbourg [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

