<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian.co.uk: Handling reader responses in a &#8216;digital age&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/23/guardiancouk-handling-reader-responses-in-a-digital-age/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/23/guardiancouk-handling-reader-responses-in-a-digital-age/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guardian video editing reaches new level of low quality &#171; Inky Binary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/23/guardiancouk-handling-reader-responses-in-a-digital-age/comment-page-1/#comment-13760</link>
		<dc:creator>Guardian video editing reaches new level of low quality &#171; Inky Binary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 10:58:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=8358#comment-13760</guid>
		<description>[...] Guardian.co.uk: Handling reader responses in a &#8216;digital age&#8217; (blogs.journalism.co.uk) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Guardian.co.uk: Handling reader responses in a &#8216;digital age&#8217; (blogs.journalism.co.uk) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

