<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC&#8217;s Paul Mason: Newsrooms offer journalists peer review that &#8216;pyjama bloggers&#8217; can&#8217;t replicate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/05/bbcs-paul-mason-newsrooms-offer-journalists-peer-review-that-pyjama-bloggers-cant-replicate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/05/bbcs-paul-mason-newsrooms-offer-journalists-peer-review-that-pyjama-bloggers-cant-replicate/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Taylor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/05/bbcs-paul-mason-newsrooms-offer-journalists-peer-review-that-pyjama-bloggers-cant-replicate/comment-page-1/#comment-106202</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2011 11:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6425#comment-106202</guid>
		<description>The difficulty with peer review is that it not only excludes the unexpert but also the occasional person so much more &quot;expert&quot; than his/her presumed peers that they cannot immediately understand him.  In science it is a perennial problem typified by the treatment not just of Galileo but of Royal Society member Oliver Heaviside, inventor of the theory of electric circuit dynamics.

The difficulty with blogs is that the occasional expert contribution gets localised and lost in a sea of waffle, much as happened to interpretation of peer reviewed translations of the Bible after the invention of printing.
On both counts, Paul etc need to be privately accessible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difficulty with peer review is that it not only excludes the unexpert but also the occasional person so much more &#8220;expert&#8221; than his/her presumed peers that they cannot immediately understand him.  In science it is a perennial problem typified by the treatment not just of Galileo but of Royal Society member Oliver Heaviside, inventor of the theory of electric circuit dynamics.</p>
<p>The difficulty with blogs is that the occasional expert contribution gets localised and lost in a sea of waffle, much as happened to interpretation of peer reviewed translations of the Bible after the invention of printing.<br />
On both counts, Paul etc need to be privately accessible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Mason on blogging and peer reviews &#171; Alice Talks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/05/bbcs-paul-mason-newsrooms-offer-journalists-peer-review-that-pyjama-bloggers-cant-replicate/comment-page-1/#comment-9310</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mason on blogging and peer reviews &#171; Alice Talks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6425#comment-9310</guid>
		<description>[...] Mason, economics editor of Newsnight, recently dismissed the idea of bloggers as authoritative as they lack the crucial feedback of a news... “A newsroom is a real-time peer review system - that bloggers in their pyjamas can’t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mason, economics editor of Newsnight, recently dismissed the idea of bloggers as authoritative as they lack the crucial feedback of a news&#8230; “A newsroom is a real-time peer review system &#8211; that bloggers in their pyjamas can’t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-01-06 &#171; Common User</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/05/bbcs-paul-mason-newsrooms-offer-journalists-peer-review-that-pyjama-bloggers-cant-replicate/comment-page-1/#comment-9182</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-01-06 &#171; Common User</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6425#comment-9182</guid>
		<description>[...] BBC’s Paul Mason: Newsrooms offer journalists peer review that ‘pyjama bloggers’ can’t repli... Mason clarifies his blogger comment. &quot;I reject the theory that social media will simply destroy journalism; and that skill and status and above all income (!) cannot be defended in a world of easy-to-use technology. I certainly don’t dismiss bloggers. However I think their limitations are being exposed, just as journalists’ limitations are.&quot; (tags: journalism paulmason bloggers mason) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BBC’s Paul Mason: Newsrooms offer journalists peer review that ‘pyjama bloggers’ can’t repli&#8230; Mason clarifies his blogger comment. &quot;I reject the theory that social media will simply destroy journalism; and that skill and status and above all income (!) cannot be defended in a world of easy-to-use technology. I certainly don’t dismiss bloggers. However I think their limitations are being exposed, just as journalists’ limitations are.&quot; (tags: journalism paulmason bloggers mason) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Mason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/05/bbcs-paul-mason-newsrooms-offer-journalists-peer-review-that-pyjama-bloggers-cant-replicate/comment-page-1/#comment-9178</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6425#comment-9178</guid>
		<description>I am not attempting to sum up a defence of journalism in this interview: I am trying to define what the future is for the union. Hopefully many of you will be union members: if so you will know that there is a debate about what to do in the face of new technology. The essence of my argument is that the union has to be an organisation that engages the media bosses about their agenda, and becomes the collective brain of the workforce, policing and extending what industrial relations experts once called &quot;the frontier of control&quot;. Because the interview was for the union website it took a lot of things for granted. Those of you who know my work will know I am not anti-blogging: I am pro it - and I mean real blogging not the ersatz blogs the BBC lets us do. But I reject the theory that social media will simply destroy journalism; and that skill and status and above all income (!) cannot be defended in a world of easy-to-use technology. I certainly don&#039;t dismiss bloggers. However I think their limitations are being exposed, just as journalists&#039; limitations are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not attempting to sum up a defence of journalism in this interview: I am trying to define what the future is for the union. Hopefully many of you will be union members: if so you will know that there is a debate about what to do in the face of new technology. The essence of my argument is that the union has to be an organisation that engages the media bosses about their agenda, and becomes the collective brain of the workforce, policing and extending what industrial relations experts once called &#8220;the frontier of control&#8221;. Because the interview was for the union website it took a lot of things for granted. Those of you who know my work will know I am not anti-blogging: I am pro it &#8211; and I mean real blogging not the ersatz blogs the BBC lets us do. But I reject the theory that social media will simply destroy journalism; and that skill and status and above all income (!) cannot be defended in a world of easy-to-use technology. I certainly don&#8217;t dismiss bloggers. However I think their limitations are being exposed, just as journalists&#8217; limitations are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Cain</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/05/bbcs-paul-mason-newsrooms-offer-journalists-peer-review-that-pyjama-bloggers-cant-replicate/comment-page-1/#comment-9173</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Cain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6425#comment-9173</guid>
		<description>Maybe that was Andrew Gilligan&#039;s problem on THAT Today Programme report. If only he&#039;s been in the newsroom rather than &#039;working from home&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe that was Andrew Gilligan&#8217;s problem on THAT Today Programme report. If only he&#8217;s been in the newsroom rather than &#8216;working from home&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#160; Interesting stuff for Monday&#160;by&#160;andydickinson.net</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/05/bbcs-paul-mason-newsrooms-offer-journalists-peer-review-that-pyjama-bloggers-cant-replicate/comment-page-1/#comment-9155</link>
		<dc:creator>&#160; Interesting stuff for Monday&#160;by&#160;andydickinson.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6425#comment-9155</guid>
		<description>[...] gives his views (on video) on the uncertain times ahead. Comment about this video has been sharp, particularly for his &#8220;pyjama bloggers&#8221; comment. But if you listen to the first 3 minutes that seems unfair [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gives his views (on video) on the uncertain times ahead. Comment about this video has been sharp, particularly for his &#8220;pyjama bloggers&#8221; comment. But if you listen to the first 3 minutes that seems unfair [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Clayton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/05/bbcs-paul-mason-newsrooms-offer-journalists-peer-review-that-pyjama-bloggers-cant-replicate/comment-page-1/#comment-9152</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Clayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6425#comment-9152</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a neat contradiction here. It seems Paul Mason&#039;s receiving more of a peer review online than he could ever get in a newsroom. (That&#039;s unless he only sees other BBC hacks as his peers.)

Anyway, arguments focused on the quality of journalism seldom succeed against the power of economics, although the Beeb is different. It isn&#039;t a commercial organisation. Elsewhere media companies are generally driven to by cost with quality falling a poor second.

Mason&#039;s argument reminds me of what was said about the threats to journalistic standards when News International abandoned Fleet Street. Quality probably did suffer following the forced march away from peer review establishments such as El Vinos, the Cheshire Cheese and the Kings and Keys. But the sober hacks were able to churn out more copy when they were locked in Fortress Wapping than they ever had before. Sales didn&#039;t suffer that much either.

As long as journalists simply dismiss &quot;pyjama-clad bloggers&quot; we won&#039;t get anywhere. If there&#039;s an audience for a person or organisation it really doesn&#039;t matter what they wear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a neat contradiction here. It seems Paul Mason&#8217;s receiving more of a peer review online than he could ever get in a newsroom. (That&#8217;s unless he only sees other BBC hacks as his peers.)</p>
<p>Anyway, arguments focused on the quality of journalism seldom succeed against the power of economics, although the Beeb is different. It isn&#8217;t a commercial organisation. Elsewhere media companies are generally driven to by cost with quality falling a poor second.</p>
<p>Mason&#8217;s argument reminds me of what was said about the threats to journalistic standards when News International abandoned Fleet Street. Quality probably did suffer following the forced march away from peer review establishments such as El Vinos, the Cheshire Cheese and the Kings and Keys. But the sober hacks were able to churn out more copy when they were locked in Fortress Wapping than they ever had before. Sales didn&#8217;t suffer that much either.</p>
<p>As long as journalists simply dismiss &#8220;pyjama-clad bloggers&#8221; we won&#8217;t get anywhere. If there&#8217;s an audience for a person or organisation it really doesn&#8217;t matter what they wear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julian Bray</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/05/bbcs-paul-mason-newsrooms-offer-journalists-peer-review-that-pyjama-bloggers-cant-replicate/comment-page-1/#comment-9151</link>
		<dc:creator>Julian Bray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 15:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6425#comment-9151</guid>
		<description>If this is the state of the nation message on British journalism then we are in big trouble. Time for deskbound computer tied journos of all hues to get out more. The interview was very depressing and to cap it all he hails from North of Watford; so has the mandatory BBC regional mancunian type twang...Happy New Year...opens a bottle of Fullers London Pride...all is well with the world!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is the state of the nation message on British journalism then we are in big trouble. Time for deskbound computer tied journos of all hues to get out more. The interview was very depressing and to cap it all he hails from North of Watford; so has the mandatory BBC regional mancunian type twang&#8230;Happy New Year&#8230;opens a bottle of Fullers London Pride&#8230;all is well with the world!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

