<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Accredited media&#8217; not yet defined, Ministry of Justice tells Journalism.co.uk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/17/accredited-media-not-yet-defined-ministry-of-justice-tells-journalismcouk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/17/accredited-media-not-yet-defined-ministry-of-justice-tells-journalismcouk/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Justice - Access to &#8216;Accredited Media&#8217; &#171; Pink Tape</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/17/accredited-media-not-yet-defined-ministry-of-justice-tells-journalismcouk/comment-page-1/#comment-10150</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Justice - Access to &#8216;Accredited Media&#8217; &#171; Pink Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 19:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6091#comment-10150</guid>
		<description>[...] 12, 2009 by familoo    Journalism.co.uk notes an interesting issue about who will comprise the group &#8216;accredited media&#8217; for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 12, 2009 by familoo    Journalism.co.uk notes an interesting issue about who will comprise the group &#8216;accredited media&#8217; for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open Justice - Access to &#8216;Accredited Media&#8217; &#171; Pink Tape</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/17/accredited-media-not-yet-defined-ministry-of-justice-tells-journalismcouk/comment-page-1/#comment-10028</link>
		<dc:creator>Open Justice - Access to &#8216;Accredited Media&#8217; &#171; Pink Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6091#comment-10028</guid>
		<description>[...] 11, 2009 by familoo    Journalism.co.uk notes an interesting issue about who will comprise the group &#8216;accredited media&#8217; for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 11, 2009 by familoo    Journalism.co.uk notes an interesting issue about who will comprise the group &#8216;accredited media&#8217; for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NY Blogger Three: issued press credentials but still pursuing legal action &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/17/accredited-media-not-yet-defined-ministry-of-justice-tells-journalismcouk/comment-page-1/#comment-9330</link>
		<dc:creator>NY Blogger Three: issued press credentials but still pursuing legal action &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:54:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6091#comment-9330</guid>
		<description>[...] As Journalism.co.uk reported on this blog in December, the definition of &#8216;journalist&#8217; has not yet been clari... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As Journalism.co.uk reported on this blog in December, the definition of &#8216;journalist&#8217; has not yet been clari&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth Robillard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/17/accredited-media-not-yet-defined-ministry-of-justice-tells-journalismcouk/comment-page-1/#comment-9150</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth Robillard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6091#comment-9150</guid>
		<description>Hi. Some of us are working hard to reveal injustices in secret family courts and wish to help children in care homes and so on. If you have any para-legals or journalists - please note we would like for you to attend the opening of the family courts as promised by Jack Straw. As you know, the current process is to ignore families in need (baby P comes to mind) and take children from families where there is no problem, to ensure lengthy protracted legal proceedings so as to fatten the pockets of the family lawyers. We&#039;d like some support please. Thank you for your time. Elizabeth Robillard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. Some of us are working hard to reveal injustices in secret family courts and wish to help children in care homes and so on. If you have any para-legals or journalists &#8211; please note we would like for you to attend the opening of the family courts as promised by Jack Straw. As you know, the current process is to ignore families in need (baby P comes to mind) and take children from families where there is no problem, to ensure lengthy protracted legal proceedings so as to fatten the pockets of the family lawyers. We&#8217;d like some support please. Thank you for your time. Elizabeth Robillard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

