<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eric Schmidt &#8211; Google resistance to ACAP based on technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/03/19/eric-schmidt-google-resistance-to-acap-based-on-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/03/19/eric-schmidt-google-resistance-to-acap-based-on-technology/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 22:14:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chuck</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/03/19/eric-schmidt-google-resistance-to-acap-based-on-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-2223</link>
		<dc:creator>chuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/03/19/eric-schmidt-google-resistance-to-acap-based-on-technology/#comment-2223</guid>
		<description>I spoke with the director of Web search R&amp;D at the French search company Exalead, which worked with ACAP to develop the protocol. He told me that what Schmidt said about technology obstacles &quot;made no sense.&quot; Exalead has been working with the search engine companies for over a year on acap, which is just an extension of robots.txt. Does anyone really believe that a company with Google&#039;s technical ability would not have figured it out by now? Google might be being a little bad. contact me if you&#039;re interested in reading my story in the most recent seybold report.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spoke with the director of Web search R&amp;D at the French search company Exalead, which worked with ACAP to develop the protocol. He told me that what Schmidt said about technology obstacles &#8220;made no sense.&#8221; Exalead has been working with the search engine companies for over a year on acap, which is just an extension of robots.txt. Does anyone really believe that a company with Google&#8217;s technical ability would not have figured it out by now? Google might be being a little bad. contact me if you&#8217;re interested in reading my story in the most recent seybold report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

