<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia and getting your facts straight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2007/10/05/wikipedia-and-getting-your-facts-straight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2007/10/05/wikipedia-and-getting-your-facts-straight/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: GadgetGadget.info - Gadgets on the web &#187; Wikipedia and getting your facts straight</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2007/10/05/wikipedia-and-getting-your-facts-straight/comment-page-1/#comment-3221</link>
		<dc:creator>GadgetGadget.info - Gadgets on the web &#187; Wikipedia and getting your facts straight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 10:21:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2007/10/05/wikipedia-and-getting-your-facts-straight/#comment-3221</guid>
		<description>[...] Danny Sullivan wrote an interesting post today!.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptIt seems almost too obvious to point out, but journalists using Wikipedia should remember that you can’t always believe what you read in an online encyclopaedia. As an article in The Register shows, many hacks fell foul of this caveat &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Danny Sullivan wrote an interesting post today!.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptIt seems almost too obvious to point out, but journalists using Wikipedia should remember that you can’t always believe what you read in an online encyclopaedia. As an article in The Register shows, many hacks fell foul of this caveat &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

